President Donald Trump’s recent executive order titled “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” has sparked widespread debate and concern. Signed on January 20, 2025, the order aims to end birthright citizenship for certain children born in the United States. This move has raised numerous questions about its implications, legality, and potential impact on the country. Below, we address some of the most frequently asked questions to provide clarity on this controversial topic.
What Is Birthright Citizenship?
Birthright citizenship is a principle rooted in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which has been in effect since 1868. It grants U.S. citizenship to anyone born on American soil, regardless of their parents’ nationality or immigration status. This concept, known as jus soli (“right of the soil”), ensures that citizenship is determined by birthplace rather than parentage.
What Does President Trump’s Executive Order Entail?
The executive order seeks to end birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. under specific circumstances. It applies to situations where:
The mother was unlawfully present in the U.S., and the father was neither a U.S. citizen nor a lawful permanent resident at the time of the child’s birth.
The mother was in the U.S. on a temporary status (e.g., student, work, or tourist visa), and the father was neither a U.S. citizen nor a lawful permanent resident when the child was born.
The order is set to take effect on February 19, 2025, but it has already faced significant legal and political challenges.
Can the President End Birthright Citizenship Through an Executive Order?
Legal experts largely agree that the President does not have the authority to unilaterally end birthright citizenship. The 14th Amendment explicitly states that “all persons born or naturalized in the United States… are citizens of the United States.” Altering this constitutional right would require a constitutional amendment, not an executive order. The move is expected to be scrutinized in courts, with many predicting it will ultimately be struck down.
What Legal Challenges Has the Executive Order Faced?
Within hours of the order’s signing, 18 states filed lawsuits against the federal government, arguing that it violates the Constitution. Additionally, civil rights and immigration advocacy groups have taken legal action to block its implementation. The matter is expected to reach the Supreme Court, where its fate will be decided.
As of now, 22 states have joined the lawsuits against the executive order, further intensifying the legal battle. This coalition of states reflects widespread opposition and underscores the significant constitutional and societal concerns raised by the order.
Recently, a federal district court judge in Seattle temporarily blocked the executive order, marking a significant early victory for its opponents. Senior U.S. District Judge John C. Coughenour, a Ronald Reagan appointee, issued a 14-day restraining order, halting the policy from taking effect. Judge Coughenour, who described the order as “blatantly unconstitutional,” highlighted the clarity of the constitutional issue at hand. The case, brought by four states and immigrant rights organizations, is among five lawsuits challenging the policy as unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment. Further briefings are expected as the legal battle unfolds.
How Does the U.S. Approach to Birthright Citizenship Compare Globally?
Globally, the U.S. is one of the few countries that follows jus soli to its full extent. While many nations grant citizenship based on parentage (jus sanguinis), others have adopted mixed systems with specific conditions for granting citizenship to children born on their soil. For instance, countries like Australia and Germany require at least one parent to be a citizen or legal resident for the child to obtain citizenship.
What Are the Potential Implications if the Executive Order Is Upheld?
If the executive order is upheld, it could result in a significant number of individuals born in the U.S. without citizenship. This raises concerns about:
Statelessness: Individuals could find themselves without any citizenship, leading to legal and social complications.
Legal Ambiguities: Questions about access to public services, education, and employment would arise.
Erosion of Constitutional Rights: Critics argue that the order undermines the 14th Amendment and sets a dangerous precedent for altering constitutional protections.
Conclusion
President Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship has ignited a fierce legal and political battle. While its constitutionality remains in question, the potential societal and legal impacts are profound. As the nation awaits further developments, it is crucial to stay informed about this issue and its implications for the future of American citizenship.
Do you have questions regarding these changes? Contact Dehra Miokte at (813) 221-0733 today! Our team is ready to assist!